Radiant energy was used extensively in medicine around the beginning of
the 20th century with the advent of Finsen's filtered ultraviolet carbon
arc lamp, for which Niels Finsen received the 1903 Nobel Prize in
Physiology or Medicine. Clinics popped up throughout Europe that treated
rickets, tuberculosis and a host of other diseases successfully by way of
precisely timed exposures to outdoor sunlight_and indoor broad-spectrum
light produced by the electric carbon arc lamp and, later, the
narrow-spectrum mercury vapour UV light emitters.
Up
until about 1935, carbon arc lamps and mercury vapour lamps were in wide
use throughout the medical community because of the unique ability of
light to create changes in the chemistry of the body fluids which
stimulate the immune system, thus producing a powerful
pathogen-devitalising environment. The effects were not just topical; the
lamps created responses deep inside the body, far away from the points of
initial illumination. Many diseases responded well to. the treatments
without the dangerous side effects of the poisonous, chemical-based drugs
that were soon to follow on the timeline of medical evolution.
As
medicine became organised as a result of the powers of the emerging
pharmaceutical industry with its new sulphur-based drugs, the use of
illuminative radiant energy in the treatment of disease quickly
disappeared from the medical scene. The energy technology of radiant light
illumination was far more effective than the chemical drugs but not as
profitable, hence actinotherapy, as it was called, rapidly fell out of
use.
With the advent of medical licensing and the subsequent threat of
de-certification, physicians who continued to use the proven technology
risked losing their licence to practise medicine, hence the reason why
full-spectrum light treatments are not widely used today and why few
practitioners have ever heard of this remarkable healing technology.
Doctors of today are clueless about this technology; if told of it, they
would likely baulk at it and dismiss it as quackery. Nothing, however,
could be further from the truth. This technology is an important relic of
medical history, and these doctors would be awestruck to learn of the
extensive healing potency it provided. Yet, by the ordained decree of
medical politics, this energy technology remains a taboo in the profession
and thus beyond reach.
The public has been conditioned to believe that somehow energies from the
Sun or its approximates is somehow dangerous and that such exposures
should be limited or avoided altogether. However, this fear of nature is a
recent occurrence which parallels the expansion of information
technologies and mass advertising. Protective clothing, lotions and
eyewear of uncountable varieties have all been the result of clever
advertising for the purpose of making money for the manufacturers, not to
mention for the relatively new class of doctors who specialise
specifically in dermatology. If the truth be known that sunlight is good
for us and lack of it is harmful, sales would not be nearly as brisk as
they now are and many practitioners would be forced to learn a new medical
speciality.
When the baby-boomer generation was growing up, we never heard of such a
preposterous assumption that sunlight was bad for us and we ran around
half naked and without sun-blocking our skin with oils—which, at that
time, had no light-filtering capabilities. Can you recall anyone you knew
developing skin cancer? Or any cancer for that matter? It's true that the
incidence of skin cancer, as well as other forms of cancer, has been on a
marked increase over the last half-century, but to blame it on the Sun is
ridiculous.
Mankind would never have made it this far if the Sun were harmful. The
theory about the ozone layer, with its supposed increase in UV
transmissions, has not yet been proven satisfactorily. People lived
outdoors for thousands of years in sunlight without the aid of sunglasses,
and there is no evidence in written history of mass blindness or outbreaks
of skin cancer as a result. Animals don't run around wearing sunglasses
and their vision appears to be just fine. Nor has it been adequately
demonstrated that the Sun's rays are the true cause of skin cancer. Many
informed researchers believe that skin cancer results from internal
chemical pollution that is exacerbated by exposure to the UV rays, the
energy — being a catalyst in a chemical reaction.
This is yet another area in which medical science pontificates without
conducting its favourite double-blind studies. Incidentally, these studies
cannot be "blind", as researchers and participants can easily tell in most
cases if the methods being tried have any effects during the course of the
study. Often the published observations are contrary to the results of the
studies because some vested interest funded them. No study so far has ever
proved God to be wrong. Man, on the other hand...
Melanomas occur more often in indoor workers than outdoor workers, and the
lesions often appear in areas never subjected to the influences of light
exposure. Vitamin D, which is made in the skin from egosterol, is vital in
keeping cancers at bay; people who do not get enough light exposure have a
significantly greater amount of cancer than those who remain active out of
doors and produce the necessary amounts of vitamin D as a result.
Dr
John N. Ott reports in his classic Health and Light (1976) that many cases
of disease, including cancers and tuberculosis (TB), rapidly cleared up
when patients stopped using sunglasses and exposed themselves to
unfiltered sunlight several hours per day. European tuberculosis clinics
in the Swiss Alps used sun solariums extensively for the treatment of TB.
Dr Auguste Rollier, author of Heliotherapy (1923) and among the most
famous practitioners of the time, pioneered the use of sunlight in the
treatment of numerous diseases, having developed measurable scientific
methods that were quickly adopted worldwide. The carbon arc lamp was
chosen because its frequency spectrum is very close to that of natural
sunlight; it could be used indoors regardless of weather conditions, and
exposures could be gauged more accurately. Dr Rollier's clinic was opened
in 1903 in Leysin, Switzerland. The facilities became the American College
of Switzerland in the early 1950s.'
CLEARING PARASITES
A major
secret to health is to eliminate the abundance of organisms that live in
the digestive tract in about 95 per cent of the world's population,
excreting poisonous toxins that osmotically pass into the body fluids and
thus contaminate the internal environment, triggering the onset of disease
of many varieties. Intestinal cleansing forms of personal hygiene (removal
of the parasites and accumulated impacted waste) are rarely practised in
the United States and slightly more so in Europe.
Hollywood
movie actors are an exception, as the majority of them are devout
practitioners of colonic irrigation to maintain their physical appearance
and their desire to remain disease free.
There are other less-intrusive methods to remove the parasites, such as
the use of Homozon and various herbal concoctions, but few cleansing
methods adequately deal with the tapeworm. Homozon, developed by Dr Eugene
Blass in 1898, is a compound which binds oxygen to magnesium. It remains
the best-known intestinal cleanser for the removal of impacted waste
material from the linings of the large intestine. Nothing, other than
mechanical extraction, compares in its power when used for such a purpose.
It is intended for short-term use only. Other oxygenating substances can
be used afterwards to maintain stasis of the colon.
Be
sure that any internal oxygenating substances used are not chlorine based
(as many are), because these deplete iodine which is required for the
normal function of the thyroid gland. Always follow up cleansing with
probiotics such as acidophilus/ bifidus (as should also be done whenever
taking antibiotics).
Death begins in the colon for reasons that should be obvious, yet very few
people properly address this critical issue of personal hygiene, even
though doing so would likely reduce the illness rate of the entire
population by perhaps 85 per cent or more. Such knowledge, if discovered
and practised by the average citizen, would have serious impact on the
economic structure of the medical industry—which is why, should you ask a
doctor for advice on the concept of colon cleansing, the answer you will
get will be discouraging.
Doctors are trained to respond in this manner, as they were told in
medical school how to avoid questions that would place the profession in a
dim light, which is where it should be. The last thing capitalistic
medicine desires is to deliver true health; if it did, this would result
in a tremendous loss of customers.
Herbal intestinal cleanses of numerous varieties based upon known
purgatives are quite effective in eliminating most parasites, but the
mighty tapeworm often escapes total destruction from almost any form of
herbal or chemical assault upon it. However, the tapeworm cannot survive
mechanical fracture when exposed to the high energy levels of
full-spectrum vibratory light. The energy impinged at close proximity to
the loci of the electric carbon arc is so great that the animal simply
breaks apart throughout the entire length of its body within 30 seconds of
such intense light exposure.
THE CARBON ARC LAMP
The energy
band of the carbon arc electric lamp ranges from the heat-producing
invisible infrared end of the light spectrum through the invisible
ultraviolet, to wavelengths as short as 180 nanometres, which remain below
the spectral band of the dangerous energy emitted by X-rays. Thus the
radiation exposures from the electric carbon arc lamp are not ionising as
are X-rays and thus constitute no danger to the user, other than perhaps
erythmas (skin burns) produced by overexposure to the intense energy-laden
light or conjunctivitis if one gazes into its alluring flame.
A
simple and inexpensive electric carbon arc treatment lamp can be
constructed for under US$20. When used with proper precautions, it is safe
and extremely effective. Instructions are available via the June-July 2006
issue of Nexus at www.nexusmagazine.com
It
is unnecessary to wear eye protection of any kind as the ultraviolet rays,
contrary to popular belief, are beneficial to the eyes, although you -do
not want to look directly at the flame. Prolonged exposure will result in
non-harmful but uncomfortable conjunctivitis which will disappear within a
few days with no permanent harm to the mechanism of the eyes. The harmful
rays of the shorter, ultraviolet rays are absorbed within the eye so that
the rods and cones are not damaged by such exposures.
Except for wearing tennis shoes and rubber gloves, stand naked on an
insulating surface – such as several layers of old carpet, newspapers or
the floor mats out of your car – so that you are protected from the
floor. Make sure that any insulating material you select is completely
dry: any moisture, whether obvious or not, constitutes a shock hazard.
Place your belly within four to six inches of the locus of the flame, and
slowly rotate and squat slightly so that the entire abdomen is evenly
exposed to the light. Stop the exposure after about 30 seconds or so by
moving away from the flame and then unplugging the power plug from the
service outlet. Without periodic adjustment of the spacing between the
carbon rods, the arc will remain lit for a period of about 45 seconds or
so, which is adequate for a single exposure.
Depending upon your particular bowel transfer time, results can be felt as
a very dull discomfort that may tend to move in your abdomen. Within six
to twelve hours, the body of the worm(s) will pass in the form of
diarrhoea. The waste is often blue or green, which is excess bile being
dumped by the liver and gall bladder. This is not the colour of the worm
but the colour of your bile that didn't have time to process the waste
which normally would change colour during the elimination process, which
then is reddish-brown in colour. Future stool discharges may appear a
light tan to almost white for a few days. Don't panic, as the bile
creation will resume and the stool will again become its normal colour.
Should any gallstones have been present, it is probable that they
disintegrated during the treatment and were painlessly passed without your
knowledge. The use of an alternative liver and gall bladder cleanse method
would be desirable at the time of exposure to ensure better and more
complete elimination of these potentially problematic entities.'
Energy Detox
gives the body the needed boost to start to return integrity to
the body,
enabling it
to reverse
the decades of accumulated poisons.
It does not treat disease.
