In
organizations of all types and sizes, we have effectively killed and
buried creative leadership in the following ways:
•
Emphasize managing instead of pioneering. Many U.S. companies are
very well managed, but poorly led. Managers may handle routine tasks
well, but no one bothers to ask whether "this" should be done at
all. Routine work smothers creativity and change, but because
routine work is easier to deal with, there's an unconscious
conspiracy to immerse ourselves in routine and avoid the tough
questions.
•
Insist on harmony and pseudo-agreement. The cohesiveness of most
organizations depends on a commonly held set of values. Anyone who
does not share the common culture is an outsider, at angle to the
conventional (and often misguided) wisdom. But unanimity leads to
stagnation. The individual who sees things differently is the
company's vital link to change and adaptation. Every leader, like
King Lear, needs at least one fool to challenge what is sacred and
to herald the advent of cosmic shifts.
•
Reward destructive achievers. Our whole attitude toward leaders is
tainted by the likes of Gary Hart, Ivan E Boesky, and Oliver North.
They have in common two of the three qualities that every leader
needs: ambition and expertise. They lack the third: integrity.
For what research confirms employees would tell bosses
- if asked, send an email to bs@futurevisions.org with
"MWS research on bosses" in the subject
and nothing in the body